Why Your Long Distance Flirtationship Is Holding You Back

Why Your Long Distance Flirtationship Is Holding You Back

Every major relationship in my life has been long distance. From going to different high schools and seeing each other once a week, to being on opposite sides of the country and flying back and forth every few months, I’ve chosen to be in relationships in which geographic location is not exactly a strong suit. I say chosen because that’s what they were, choices. Ok, going to all-girls high school did mean that I wasn’t going to find anyone in English class, but other than that I’ve been in situations where love was just as available at arm’s reach, if I was only willing to look for it.

Portland, Oregon and New York City are both happening spots, albeit in different ways, with plenty of eligible young men. To deny that would be absurdly incorrect as well as unfair to them. And yet, I’ve looked past them in favor of men who are far harder to actually form a healthy relationship with. In this, I seem to not be alone.

A close friend, visiting for a weekend, alternated between updating me on her life, sipping coconut oolong, and checked her perennially buzzing phone. It was, she shared, a man who she is very much in to, has great chemistry with, and texts upwards of 30 times a day. What’s the problem you ask? Well, he happens to live on a different continent.

“Love hath no boundaries!” we say.

A mantra in the truest sense – technically true but simultaneously something that we are constantly trying to convince ourselves of.

Perhaps it is the mystery of a far off lover, the ease of conversation when arguments are few and far between, or the promise of adventurous trips and romance built on long-weekends at cozy bed and breakfast’s that attract us to this arrangement. It is likely all of those things to an extent. However, more than anything, I’ve realized that digital-based long distance relationships give women, especially ambitious and successful young women who strain to find the time to date, access to a relationship on their terms.

With great technology comes great power.

Guy texts? You get to decide when to respond. Guy calls? Ignoring them is a perfectly viable option that you may take more often then not. The slew of apps that are meant to foster connection, Skype, Facebook, Whatsapp, etc., actually enable us to control communication to a wild extent. Each text can be agonized over and rephrased a dozen times before hitting send. Each Skype conversation can be upbeat and perky, staying away from serious subjects like investor troubles, launch delays, and the million other things that keep you up at night.

What these young women are losing sight of, myself included, is that long distance works both ways.

We aren’t the only ones ignoring texts and declining Google Hangouts. That person that we assume will always be there to text us “Goodmorning” followed by a different cheesy emoticon each day is playing the same game.

Sometimes you fall for someone you can’t have. For some reason we immediately categorize this as meaning that the person is already in a relationship, but not being able to “have” someone is actually a much more varied issue.

Location is a piece of it and, in the majority of cases, a relationship fostered 3000 miles apart isn’t going to survive the 3” of space left when you share a bed.

You don’t have to turn down opportunities just because they are long-distance, but don’t let them blind you to the chances for love that might be right in front of you. That bar across the street from you that you avoid like the plague might be the favorite spot of your next love, you never know till you shut down your computer, silence your phone, shower (totally optional), and go.